‘Freedom is collective autonomy under anarchy’. However, rigid streets, flat landscapes, and established/fixed urban systems and infrastructures force the city to become unanimous. Instead, spaces become more detailed and stimulating to express themselves amid the unified urban system. This clouds the perception of the city’s users even more, stripping them of autonomous thought and behavior.
 
This project is an architect’s essay about how the city should function as an alternative to the current state. The place suggests different systems in which the city could function, and this system is shown indirectly through the architecture of space. This architectural message is done in a monumental but abstract way so as to show explicitly to the users that this space aims to deliver a strong message. The monumental aspects of the site stimulate autonomous thinking because loud, explicit arguments stimulate protective instincts and encourage critical thinking. The abstract aspects of the site encourage autonomous behavior and participation because it stimulates the human urge to fill blank spaces with their own creations.
 
This project is not merely an architect’s essay but a highly profitable development. An unrealistic or unsustainable essay on space is insignificant because it cannot be widely experienced by the public. An essay only read and imagined between suppliers is irrelevant because the driving factor of urban development, which is the public's purse and ballot, will not move unless it is very appealing and pleasant to them.
 
The readers need only focus on four keywords in the complex web of different systems and architectural gestures; abstraction, monumentality, sustainability, profitable